Hands-on Exercise 9

Author

Xu Haiyang

Published

October 22, 2024

Modified

October 23, 2024

Overview

Geographically weighted regression (GWR) is a spatial statistical technique that takes non-stationary variables into consideration (e.g., climate; demographic factors; physical environment characteristics) and models the local relationships between these independent variables and an outcome of interest (also known as dependent variable). In this hands-on exercise, you will learn how to build hedonic pricing models by using GWR methods. The dependent variable is the resale prices of condominium in 2015. The independent variables are divided into either structural and locational.

The Data

Two data sets will be used in this model building exercise, they are:

  • URA Master Plan subzone boundary in shapefile format (i.e. MP14_SUBZONE_WEB_PL)

  • condo_resale_2015 in csv format (i.e. condo_resale_2015.csv)

Getting Started

pacman::p_load(olsrr, corrplot, ggpubr, sf, spdep, GWmodel, tmap, tidyverse, gtsummary)

A short note about GWmodel

GWmodel package provides a collection of localised spatial statistical methods, namely: GW summary statistics, GW principal components analysis, GW discriminant analysis and various forms of GW regression; some of which are provided in basic and robust (outlier resistant) forms. Commonly, outputs or parameters of the GWmodel are mapped to provide a useful exploratory tool, which can often precede (and direct) a more traditional or sophisticated statistical analysis.

Geospatial Data Wrangling

Importing geospatial data

mpsz = st_read(dsn = "data/geospatial", layer = "MP14_SUBZONE_WEB_PL")
Reading layer `MP14_SUBZONE_WEB_PL' from data source 
  `C:\EasonXu-HY99\IS415\Hands-on_Ex\Hands-on_Ex09\data\geospatial' 
  using driver `ESRI Shapefile'
Simple feature collection with 323 features and 15 fields
Geometry type: MULTIPOLYGON
Dimension:     XY
Bounding box:  xmin: 2667.538 ymin: 15748.72 xmax: 56396.44 ymax: 50256.33
Projected CRS: SVY21

Updating CRS Information

I transformed the Coordinate Reference System (CRS) of the geospatial data to Singapore’s Svy21 projection (EPSG: 3414) to ensure compatibility with other datasets and consistent spatial analysis.

mpsz_svy21 <- st_transform(mpsz, 3414)
st_crs(mpsz_svy21)
Coordinate Reference System:
  User input: EPSG:3414 
  wkt:
PROJCRS["SVY21 / Singapore TM",
    BASEGEOGCRS["SVY21",
        DATUM["SVY21",
            ELLIPSOID["WGS 84",6378137,298.257223563,
                LENGTHUNIT["metre",1]]],
        PRIMEM["Greenwich",0,
            ANGLEUNIT["degree",0.0174532925199433]],
        ID["EPSG",4757]],
    CONVERSION["Singapore Transverse Mercator",
        METHOD["Transverse Mercator",
            ID["EPSG",9807]],
        PARAMETER["Latitude of natural origin",1.36666666666667,
            ANGLEUNIT["degree",0.0174532925199433],
            ID["EPSG",8801]],
        PARAMETER["Longitude of natural origin",103.833333333333,
            ANGLEUNIT["degree",0.0174532925199433],
            ID["EPSG",8802]],
        PARAMETER["Scale factor at natural origin",1,
            SCALEUNIT["unity",1],
            ID["EPSG",8805]],
        PARAMETER["False easting",28001.642,
            LENGTHUNIT["metre",1],
            ID["EPSG",8806]],
        PARAMETER["False northing",38744.572,
            LENGTHUNIT["metre",1],
            ID["EPSG",8807]]],
    CS[Cartesian,2],
        AXIS["northing (N)",north,
            ORDER[1],
            LENGTHUNIT["metre",1]],
        AXIS["easting (E)",east,
            ORDER[2],
            LENGTHUNIT["metre",1]],
    USAGE[
        SCOPE["Cadastre, engineering survey, topographic mapping."],
        AREA["Singapore - onshore and offshore."],
        BBOX[1.13,103.59,1.47,104.07]],
    ID["EPSG",3414]]
st_bbox(mpsz_svy21)
     xmin      ymin      xmax      ymax 
 2667.538 15748.721 56396.440 50256.334

Aspatial Data Wrangling

Importing the Aspatial Data

I imported the aspatial data, which contains condo resale transactions for the year 2015, into R. The dataset includes various features such as selling price, area, age of the condo, and proximities to amenities.

condo_resale = read_csv("data/aspatial/Condo_resale_2015.csv")
Rows: 1436 Columns: 23
── Column specification ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Delimiter: ","
dbl (23): LATITUDE, LONGITUDE, POSTCODE, SELLING_PRICE, AREA_SQM, AGE, PROX_...

ℹ Use `spec()` to retrieve the full column specification for this data.
ℹ Specify the column types or set `show_col_types = FALSE` to quiet this message.
glimpse(condo_resale)
Rows: 1,436
Columns: 23
$ LATITUDE             <dbl> 1.287145, 1.328698, 1.313727, 1.308563, 1.321437,…
$ LONGITUDE            <dbl> 103.7802, 103.8123, 103.7971, 103.8247, 103.9505,…
$ POSTCODE             <dbl> 118635, 288420, 267833, 258380, 467169, 466472, 3…
$ SELLING_PRICE        <dbl> 3000000, 3880000, 3325000, 4250000, 1400000, 1320…
$ AREA_SQM             <dbl> 309, 290, 248, 127, 145, 139, 218, 141, 165, 168,…
$ AGE                  <dbl> 30, 32, 33, 7, 28, 22, 24, 24, 27, 31, 17, 22, 6,…
$ PROX_CBD             <dbl> 7.941259, 6.609797, 6.898000, 4.038861, 11.783402…
$ PROX_CHILDCARE       <dbl> 0.16597932, 0.28027246, 0.42922669, 0.39473543, 0…
$ PROX_ELDERLYCARE     <dbl> 2.5198118, 1.9333338, 0.5021395, 1.9910316, 1.121…
$ PROX_URA_GROWTH_AREA <dbl> 6.618741, 7.505109, 6.463887, 4.906512, 6.410632,…
$ PROX_HAWKER_MARKET   <dbl> 1.76542207, 0.54507614, 0.37789301, 1.68259969, 0…
$ PROX_KINDERGARTEN    <dbl> 0.05835552, 0.61592412, 0.14120309, 0.38200076, 0…
$ PROX_MRT             <dbl> 0.5607188, 0.6584461, 0.3053433, 0.6910183, 0.528…
$ PROX_PARK            <dbl> 1.1710446, 0.1992269, 0.2779886, 0.9832843, 0.116…
$ PROX_PRIMARY_SCH     <dbl> 1.6340256, 0.9747834, 1.4715016, 1.4546324, 0.709…
$ PROX_TOP_PRIMARY_SCH <dbl> 3.3273195, 0.9747834, 1.4715016, 2.3006394, 0.709…
$ PROX_SHOPPING_MALL   <dbl> 2.2102717, 2.9374279, 1.2256850, 0.3525671, 1.307…
$ PROX_SUPERMARKET     <dbl> 0.9103958, 0.5900617, 0.4135583, 0.4162219, 0.581…
$ PROX_BUS_STOP        <dbl> 0.10336166, 0.28673408, 0.28504777, 0.29872340, 0…
$ NO_Of_UNITS          <dbl> 18, 20, 27, 30, 30, 31, 32, 32, 32, 32, 34, 34, 3…
$ FAMILY_FRIENDLY      <dbl> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0…
$ FREEHOLD             <dbl> 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1…
$ LEASEHOLD_99YR       <dbl> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0…

I checked a few key columns (latitude and longitude) and summarized the dataset to better understand its contents.

head(condo_resale$LONGITUDE) 
[1] 103.7802 103.8123 103.7971 103.8247 103.9505 103.9386
head(condo_resale$LATITUDE)
[1] 1.287145 1.328698 1.313727 1.308563 1.321437 1.314198
summary(condo_resale)
    LATITUDE       LONGITUDE        POSTCODE      SELLING_PRICE     
 Min.   :1.240   Min.   :103.7   Min.   : 18965   Min.   :  540000  
 1st Qu.:1.309   1st Qu.:103.8   1st Qu.:259849   1st Qu.: 1100000  
 Median :1.328   Median :103.8   Median :469298   Median : 1383222  
 Mean   :1.334   Mean   :103.8   Mean   :440439   Mean   : 1751211  
 3rd Qu.:1.357   3rd Qu.:103.9   3rd Qu.:589486   3rd Qu.: 1950000  
 Max.   :1.454   Max.   :104.0   Max.   :828833   Max.   :18000000  
    AREA_SQM          AGE           PROX_CBD       PROX_CHILDCARE    
 Min.   : 34.0   Min.   : 0.00   Min.   : 0.3869   Min.   :0.004927  
 1st Qu.:103.0   1st Qu.: 5.00   1st Qu.: 5.5574   1st Qu.:0.174481  
 Median :121.0   Median :11.00   Median : 9.3567   Median :0.258135  
 Mean   :136.5   Mean   :12.14   Mean   : 9.3254   Mean   :0.326313  
 3rd Qu.:156.0   3rd Qu.:18.00   3rd Qu.:12.6661   3rd Qu.:0.368293  
 Max.   :619.0   Max.   :37.00   Max.   :19.1804   Max.   :3.465726  
 PROX_ELDERLYCARE  PROX_URA_GROWTH_AREA PROX_HAWKER_MARKET PROX_KINDERGARTEN 
 Min.   :0.05451   Min.   :0.2145       Min.   :0.05182    Min.   :0.004927  
 1st Qu.:0.61254   1st Qu.:3.1643       1st Qu.:0.55245    1st Qu.:0.276345  
 Median :0.94179   Median :4.6186       Median :0.90842    Median :0.413385  
 Mean   :1.05351   Mean   :4.5981       Mean   :1.27987    Mean   :0.458903  
 3rd Qu.:1.35122   3rd Qu.:5.7550       3rd Qu.:1.68578    3rd Qu.:0.578474  
 Max.   :3.94916   Max.   :9.1554       Max.   :5.37435    Max.   :2.229045  
    PROX_MRT         PROX_PARK       PROX_PRIMARY_SCH  PROX_TOP_PRIMARY_SCH
 Min.   :0.05278   Min.   :0.02906   Min.   :0.07711   Min.   :0.07711     
 1st Qu.:0.34646   1st Qu.:0.26211   1st Qu.:0.44024   1st Qu.:1.34451     
 Median :0.57430   Median :0.39926   Median :0.63505   Median :1.88213     
 Mean   :0.67316   Mean   :0.49802   Mean   :0.75471   Mean   :2.27347     
 3rd Qu.:0.84844   3rd Qu.:0.65592   3rd Qu.:0.95104   3rd Qu.:2.90954     
 Max.   :3.48037   Max.   :2.16105   Max.   :3.92899   Max.   :6.74819     
 PROX_SHOPPING_MALL PROX_SUPERMARKET PROX_BUS_STOP       NO_Of_UNITS    
 Min.   :0.0000     Min.   :0.0000   Min.   :0.001595   Min.   :  18.0  
 1st Qu.:0.5258     1st Qu.:0.3695   1st Qu.:0.098356   1st Qu.: 188.8  
 Median :0.9357     Median :0.5687   Median :0.151710   Median : 360.0  
 Mean   :1.0455     Mean   :0.6141   Mean   :0.193974   Mean   : 409.2  
 3rd Qu.:1.3994     3rd Qu.:0.7862   3rd Qu.:0.220466   3rd Qu.: 590.0  
 Max.   :3.4774     Max.   :2.2441   Max.   :2.476639   Max.   :1703.0  
 FAMILY_FRIENDLY     FREEHOLD      LEASEHOLD_99YR  
 Min.   :0.0000   Min.   :0.0000   Min.   :0.0000  
 1st Qu.:0.0000   1st Qu.:0.0000   1st Qu.:0.0000  
 Median :0.0000   Median :0.0000   Median :0.0000  
 Mean   :0.4868   Mean   :0.4227   Mean   :0.4882  
 3rd Qu.:1.0000   3rd Qu.:1.0000   3rd Qu.:1.0000  
 Max.   :1.0000   Max.   :1.0000   Max.   :1.0000

Converting Aspatial Data Frame into a Spatial (sf) Object

I converted the condo_resale data frame into an sf object, using the longitude and latitude columns for spatial coordinates, and then reprojected the data to match the Svy21 CRS (EPSG: 3414).

condo_resale.sf <- st_as_sf(condo_resale,
                            coords = c("LONGITUDE", "LATITUDE"),
                            crs=4326) %>%
  st_transform(crs=3414)
head(condo_resale.sf)
Simple feature collection with 6 features and 21 fields
Geometry type: POINT
Dimension:     XY
Bounding box:  xmin: 22085.12 ymin: 29951.54 xmax: 41042.56 ymax: 34546.2
Projected CRS: SVY21 / Singapore TM
# A tibble: 6 × 22
  POSTCODE SELLING_PRICE AREA_SQM   AGE PROX_CBD PROX_CHILDCARE PROX_ELDERLYCARE
     <dbl>         <dbl>    <dbl> <dbl>    <dbl>          <dbl>            <dbl>
1   118635       3000000      309    30     7.94          0.166            2.52 
2   288420       3880000      290    32     6.61          0.280            1.93 
3   267833       3325000      248    33     6.90          0.429            0.502
4   258380       4250000      127     7     4.04          0.395            1.99 
5   467169       1400000      145    28    11.8           0.119            1.12 
6   466472       1320000      139    22    10.3           0.125            0.789
# ℹ 15 more variables: PROX_URA_GROWTH_AREA <dbl>, PROX_HAWKER_MARKET <dbl>,
#   PROX_KINDERGARTEN <dbl>, PROX_MRT <dbl>, PROX_PARK <dbl>,
#   PROX_PRIMARY_SCH <dbl>, PROX_TOP_PRIMARY_SCH <dbl>,
#   PROX_SHOPPING_MALL <dbl>, PROX_SUPERMARKET <dbl>, PROX_BUS_STOP <dbl>,
#   NO_Of_UNITS <dbl>, FAMILY_FRIENDLY <dbl>, FREEHOLD <dbl>,
#   LEASEHOLD_99YR <dbl>, geometry <POINT [m]>

Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA)

Statistical Graphics

I started the EDA by visualizing the distribution of the selling prices of condos. I used a histogram to show the spread of selling prices.

ggplot(data=condo_resale.sf, aes(x=`SELLING_PRICE`)) +
  geom_histogram(bins=20, color="black", fill="light blue")

I transformed the selling price variable by taking its logarithm to better understand its distribution, especially when dealing with skewed data.

condo_resale.sf <- condo_resale.sf %>%
  mutate(`LOG_SELLING_PRICE` = log(SELLING_PRICE))

I plotted the transformed variable (LOG_SELLING_PRICE) to see the effect of the transformation on the distribution.

ggplot(data=condo_resale.sf, aes(x=`LOG_SELLING_PRICE`)) +
  geom_histogram(bins=20, color="black", fill="light blue")

Multiple Histogram Plots for Various Variables

To get a better sense of the distribution of other variables, I plotted histograms for several condo features, including area, age, and proximities to various amenities like childcare centers, parks, and MRT stations. Each variable was visualized separately.

AREA_SQM <- ggplot(data=condo_resale.sf, aes(x= `AREA_SQM`)) + 
  geom_histogram(bins=20, color="black", fill="light blue")

AGE <- ggplot(data=condo_resale.sf, aes(x= `AGE`)) +
  geom_histogram(bins=20, color="black", fill="light blue")

PROX_CBD <- ggplot(data=condo_resale.sf, aes(x= `PROX_CBD`)) +
  geom_histogram(bins=20, color="black", fill="light blue")

PROX_CHILDCARE <- ggplot(data=condo_resale.sf, aes(x= `PROX_CHILDCARE`)) + 
  geom_histogram(bins=20, color="black", fill="light blue")

PROX_ELDERLYCARE <- ggplot(data=condo_resale.sf, aes(x= `PROX_ELDERLYCARE`)) +
  geom_histogram(bins=20, color="black", fill="light blue")

PROX_URA_GROWTH_AREA <- ggplot(data=condo_resale.sf, 
                               aes(x= `PROX_URA_GROWTH_AREA`)) +
  geom_histogram(bins=20, color="black", fill="light blue")

PROX_HAWKER_MARKET <- ggplot(data=condo_resale.sf, aes(x= `PROX_HAWKER_MARKET`)) +
  geom_histogram(bins=20, color="black", fill="light blue")

PROX_KINDERGARTEN <- ggplot(data=condo_resale.sf, aes(x= `PROX_KINDERGARTEN`)) +
  geom_histogram(bins=20, color="black", fill="light blue")

PROX_MRT <- ggplot(data=condo_resale.sf, aes(x= `PROX_MRT`)) +
  geom_histogram(bins=20, color="black", fill="light blue")

PROX_PARK <- ggplot(data=condo_resale.sf, aes(x= `PROX_PARK`)) +
  geom_histogram(bins=20, color="black", fill="light blue")

PROX_PRIMARY_SCH <- ggplot(data=condo_resale.sf, aes(x= `PROX_PRIMARY_SCH`)) +
  geom_histogram(bins=20, color="black", fill="light blue")

PROX_TOP_PRIMARY_SCH <- ggplot(data=condo_resale.sf, 
                               aes(x= `PROX_TOP_PRIMARY_SCH`)) +
  geom_histogram(bins=20, color="black", fill="light blue")

ggarrange(AREA_SQM, AGE, PROX_CBD, PROX_CHILDCARE, PROX_ELDERLYCARE, 
          PROX_URA_GROWTH_AREA, PROX_HAWKER_MARKET, PROX_KINDERGARTEN, PROX_MRT,
          PROX_PARK, PROX_PRIMARY_SCH, PROX_TOP_PRIMARY_SCH,  
          ncol = 3, nrow = 4)

Drawing Statistical Point Map

To visualize the spatial distribution of condo resale prices, I used tmap to create an interactive map with points representing each condo sale, colored by the selling price. The polygons represent the subzones in Singapore.

First, I switched to “view” mode to enable interactive mapping.

tmap_mode("view")
tmap mode set to interactive viewing

Next, I plotted the subzone polygons and overlaid the condo resale points, with each point’s color representing the selling price. The map’s zoom level was constrained for better control.

tmap_options(check.and.fix = TRUE)

tm_shape(mpsz_svy21)+
  tm_polygons() +
tm_shape(condo_resale.sf) +  
  tm_dots(col = "SELLING_PRICE",
          alpha = 0.6,
          style="quantile") +
  tm_view(set.zoom.limits = c(11,14))
Warning: The shape mpsz_svy21 is invalid (after reprojection). See
sf::st_is_valid
tmap_mode("plot")
tmap mode set to plotting

Hedonic Pricing Modelling in R

Simple Linear Regression Method

To begin exploring the relationship between condo prices and various features, I started with a Simple Linear Regression (SLR) model using the area in square meters (AREA_SQM) as the predictor of selling price.

condo.slr <- lm(formula=SELLING_PRICE ~ AREA_SQM, data = condo_resale.sf)
summary(condo.slr)

Call:
lm(formula = SELLING_PRICE ~ AREA_SQM, data = condo_resale.sf)

Residuals:
     Min       1Q   Median       3Q      Max 
-3695815  -391764   -87517   258900 13503875 

Coefficients:
             Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)    
(Intercept) -258121.1    63517.2  -4.064 5.09e-05 ***
AREA_SQM      14719.0      428.1  34.381  < 2e-16 ***
---
Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1

Residual standard error: 942700 on 1434 degrees of freedom
Multiple R-squared:  0.4518,    Adjusted R-squared:  0.4515 
F-statistic:  1182 on 1 and 1434 DF,  p-value: < 2.2e-16

To visualize this relationship, I plotted the data points and added a regression line to show the fit of the linear model.

ggplot(data=condo_resale.sf,  
       aes(x=`AREA_SQM`, y=`SELLING_PRICE`)) +
  geom_point() +
  geom_smooth(method = lm)
`geom_smooth()` using formula = 'y ~ x'

Multiple Linear Regression Method

I moved on to a Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) model, which considers multiple variables affecting condo prices. To start, I plotted a correlation matrix to explore relationships between variables.

corrplot(cor(condo_resale[, 5:23]), diag = FALSE, order = "AOE",
         tl.pos = "td", tl.cex = 0.5, method = "number", type = "upper")

Building the Hedonic Pricing Model

I then built a hedonic pricing model using the MLR method. The model includes a wide range of predictors, such as condo size, age, and proximity to amenities like MRT stations and shopping malls.

condo.mlr <- lm(formula = SELLING_PRICE ~ AREA_SQM + AGE    + 
                  PROX_CBD + PROX_CHILDCARE + PROX_ELDERLYCARE +
                  PROX_URA_GROWTH_AREA + PROX_HAWKER_MARKET + PROX_KINDERGARTEN + 
                  PROX_MRT  + PROX_PARK + PROX_PRIMARY_SCH + 
                  PROX_TOP_PRIMARY_SCH + PROX_SHOPPING_MALL + PROX_SUPERMARKET + 
                  PROX_BUS_STOP + NO_Of_UNITS + FAMILY_FRIENDLY + FREEHOLD, 
                data=condo_resale.sf)
summary(condo.mlr)

Call:
lm(formula = SELLING_PRICE ~ AREA_SQM + AGE + PROX_CBD + PROX_CHILDCARE + 
    PROX_ELDERLYCARE + PROX_URA_GROWTH_AREA + PROX_HAWKER_MARKET + 
    PROX_KINDERGARTEN + PROX_MRT + PROX_PARK + PROX_PRIMARY_SCH + 
    PROX_TOP_PRIMARY_SCH + PROX_SHOPPING_MALL + PROX_SUPERMARKET + 
    PROX_BUS_STOP + NO_Of_UNITS + FAMILY_FRIENDLY + FREEHOLD, 
    data = condo_resale.sf)

Residuals:
     Min       1Q   Median       3Q      Max 
-3475964  -293923   -23069   241043 12260381 

Coefficients:
                       Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)    
(Intercept)           481728.40  121441.01   3.967 7.65e-05 ***
AREA_SQM               12708.32     369.59  34.385  < 2e-16 ***
AGE                   -24440.82    2763.16  -8.845  < 2e-16 ***
PROX_CBD              -78669.78    6768.97 -11.622  < 2e-16 ***
PROX_CHILDCARE       -351617.91  109467.25  -3.212  0.00135 ** 
PROX_ELDERLYCARE      171029.42   42110.51   4.061 5.14e-05 ***
PROX_URA_GROWTH_AREA   38474.53   12523.57   3.072  0.00217 ** 
PROX_HAWKER_MARKET     23746.10   29299.76   0.810  0.41782    
PROX_KINDERGARTEN     147468.99   82668.87   1.784  0.07466 .  
PROX_MRT             -314599.68   57947.44  -5.429 6.66e-08 ***
PROX_PARK             563280.50   66551.68   8.464  < 2e-16 ***
PROX_PRIMARY_SCH      180186.08   65237.95   2.762  0.00582 ** 
PROX_TOP_PRIMARY_SCH    2280.04   20410.43   0.112  0.91107    
PROX_SHOPPING_MALL   -206604.06   42840.60  -4.823 1.57e-06 ***
PROX_SUPERMARKET      -44991.80   77082.64  -0.584  0.55953    
PROX_BUS_STOP         683121.35  138353.28   4.938 8.85e-07 ***
NO_Of_UNITS             -231.18      89.03  -2.597  0.00951 ** 
FAMILY_FRIENDLY       140340.77   47020.55   2.985  0.00289 ** 
FREEHOLD              359913.01   49220.22   7.312 4.38e-13 ***
---
Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1

Residual standard error: 755800 on 1417 degrees of freedom
Multiple R-squared:  0.6518,    Adjusted R-squared:  0.6474 
F-statistic: 147.4 on 18 and 1417 DF,  p-value: < 2.2e-16

Preparing Publication Quality Table: olsrr Method

To present the results in a publication-quality format, I first simplified the model by removing some variables and then used the olsrr package to create a high-quality summary table.

condo.mlr1 <- lm(formula = SELLING_PRICE ~ AREA_SQM + AGE + 
                   PROX_CBD + PROX_CHILDCARE + PROX_ELDERLYCARE +
                   PROX_URA_GROWTH_AREA + PROX_MRT  + PROX_PARK + 
                   PROX_PRIMARY_SCH + PROX_SHOPPING_MALL    + PROX_BUS_STOP + 
                   NO_Of_UNITS + FAMILY_FRIENDLY + FREEHOLD,
                 data=condo_resale.sf)
ols_regress(condo.mlr1)
                                Model Summary                                 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
R                            0.807       RMSE                     751998.679 
R-Squared                    0.651       MSE                571471422208.591 
Adj. R-Squared               0.647       Coef. Var                    43.168 
Pred R-Squared               0.638       AIC                       42966.758 
MAE                     414819.628       SBC                       43051.072 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 RMSE: Root Mean Square Error 
 MSE: Mean Square Error 
 MAE: Mean Absolute Error 
 AIC: Akaike Information Criteria 
 SBC: Schwarz Bayesian Criteria 

                                     ANOVA                                       
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Sum of                                                      
                   Squares          DF         Mean Square       F         Sig. 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regression    1.512586e+15          14        1.080418e+14    189.059    0.0000 
Residual      8.120609e+14        1421    571471422208.591                      
Total         2.324647e+15        1435                                          
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                               Parameter Estimates                                                
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
               model           Beta    Std. Error    Std. Beta       t        Sig           lower          upper 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
         (Intercept)     527633.222    108183.223                   4.877    0.000     315417.244     739849.200 
            AREA_SQM      12777.523       367.479        0.584     34.771    0.000      12056.663      13498.382 
                 AGE     -24687.739      2754.845       -0.167     -8.962    0.000     -30091.739     -19283.740 
            PROX_CBD     -77131.323      5763.125       -0.263    -13.384    0.000     -88436.469     -65826.176 
      PROX_CHILDCARE    -318472.751    107959.512       -0.084     -2.950    0.003    -530249.889    -106695.613 
    PROX_ELDERLYCARE     185575.623     39901.864        0.090      4.651    0.000     107302.737     263848.510 
PROX_URA_GROWTH_AREA      39163.254     11754.829        0.060      3.332    0.001      16104.571      62221.936 
            PROX_MRT    -294745.107     56916.367       -0.112     -5.179    0.000    -406394.234    -183095.980 
           PROX_PARK     570504.807     65507.029        0.150      8.709    0.000     442003.938     699005.677 
    PROX_PRIMARY_SCH     159856.136     60234.599        0.062      2.654    0.008      41697.849     278014.424 
  PROX_SHOPPING_MALL    -220947.251     36561.832       -0.115     -6.043    0.000    -292668.213    -149226.288 
       PROX_BUS_STOP     682482.221    134513.243        0.134      5.074    0.000     418616.359     946348.082 
         NO_Of_UNITS       -245.480        87.947       -0.053     -2.791    0.005       -418.000        -72.961 
     FAMILY_FRIENDLY     146307.576     46893.021        0.057      3.120    0.002      54320.593     238294.560 
            FREEHOLD     350599.812     48506.485        0.136      7.228    0.000     255447.802     445751.821 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Preparing Publication Quality Table: gtsummary Method

Using the gtsummary package, I created a professional-looking regression table, displaying key statistics for the regression model.

tbl_regression(condo.mlr1, intercept = TRUE)
Characteristic Beta 95% CI1 p-value
(Intercept) 527,633 315,417, 739,849 <0.001
AREA_SQM 12,778 12,057, 13,498 <0.001
AGE -24,688 -30,092, -19,284 <0.001
PROX_CBD -77,131 -88,436, -65,826 <0.001
PROX_CHILDCARE -318,473 -530,250, -106,696 0.003
PROX_ELDERLYCARE 185,576 107,303, 263,849 <0.001
PROX_URA_GROWTH_AREA 39,163 16,105, 62,222 <0.001
PROX_MRT -294,745 -406,394, -183,096 <0.001
PROX_PARK 570,505 442,004, 699,006 <0.001
PROX_PRIMARY_SCH 159,856 41,698, 278,014 0.008
PROX_SHOPPING_MALL -220,947 -292,668, -149,226 <0.001
PROX_BUS_STOP 682,482 418,616, 946,348 <0.001
NO_Of_UNITS -245 -418, -73 0.005
FAMILY_FRIENDLY 146,308 54,321, 238,295 0.002
FREEHOLD 350,600 255,448, 445,752 <0.001
1 CI = Confidence Interval

Additionally, I added key statistical measures such as R-squared, adjusted R-squared, AIC, and p-values to the table using the add_glance_source_note() function.

tbl_regression(condo.mlr1, 
               intercept = TRUE) %>% 
  add_glance_source_note(
    label = list(sigma ~ "\U03C3"),
    include = c(r.squared, adj.r.squared, 
                AIC, statistic,
                p.value, sigma))
Characteristic Beta 95% CI1 p-value
(Intercept) 527,633 315,417, 739,849 <0.001
AREA_SQM 12,778 12,057, 13,498 <0.001
AGE -24,688 -30,092, -19,284 <0.001
PROX_CBD -77,131 -88,436, -65,826 <0.001
PROX_CHILDCARE -318,473 -530,250, -106,696 0.003
PROX_ELDERLYCARE 185,576 107,303, 263,849 <0.001
PROX_URA_GROWTH_AREA 39,163 16,105, 62,222 <0.001
PROX_MRT -294,745 -406,394, -183,096 <0.001
PROX_PARK 570,505 442,004, 699,006 <0.001
PROX_PRIMARY_SCH 159,856 41,698, 278,014 0.008
PROX_SHOPPING_MALL -220,947 -292,668, -149,226 <0.001
PROX_BUS_STOP 682,482 418,616, 946,348 <0.001
NO_Of_UNITS -245 -418, -73 0.005
FAMILY_FRIENDLY 146,308 54,321, 238,295 0.002
FREEHOLD 350,600 255,448, 445,752 <0.001
R² = 0.651; Adjusted R² = 0.647; AIC = 42,967; Statistic = 189; p-value = <0.001; σ = 755,957
1 CI = Confidence Interval

Checking for Multicollinearity

I checked for multicollinearity in the multiple linear regression (MLR) model using the Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) and tolerance values. High VIF values indicate potential multicollinearity issues.

ols_vif_tol(condo.mlr1)
              Variables Tolerance      VIF
1              AREA_SQM 0.8728554 1.145665
2                   AGE 0.7071275 1.414172
3              PROX_CBD 0.6356147 1.573280
4        PROX_CHILDCARE 0.3066019 3.261559
5      PROX_ELDERLYCARE 0.6598479 1.515501
6  PROX_URA_GROWTH_AREA 0.7510311 1.331503
7              PROX_MRT 0.5236090 1.909822
8             PROX_PARK 0.8279261 1.207837
9      PROX_PRIMARY_SCH 0.4524628 2.210126
10   PROX_SHOPPING_MALL 0.6738795 1.483945
11        PROX_BUS_STOP 0.3514118 2.845664
12          NO_Of_UNITS 0.6901036 1.449058
13      FAMILY_FRIENDLY 0.7244157 1.380423
14             FREEHOLD 0.6931163 1.442759

Test for Non-Linearity

To assess the linearity assumption of the model, I plotted the residuals versus the fitted values. Non-linearity would be indicated by patterns or trends in the residuals.

ols_plot_resid_fit(condo.mlr1)

Test for Normality Assumption

I checked if the residuals from the MLR model followed a normal distribution by plotting a histogram of the residuals and performing a formal normality test.

ols_plot_resid_hist(condo.mlr1)

ols_test_normality(condo.mlr1)
Warning in ks.test.default(y, "pnorm", mean(y), sd(y)): ties should not be
present for the one-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test
-----------------------------------------------
       Test             Statistic       pvalue  
-----------------------------------------------
Shapiro-Wilk              0.6856         0.0000 
Kolmogorov-Smirnov        0.1366         0.0000 
Cramer-von Mises         121.0768        0.0000 
Anderson-Darling         67.9551         0.0000 
-----------------------------------------------

Testing for Spatial Autocorrelation

Extracting Residuals

I extracted the residuals from the MLR model and converted them into a spatial format. This step is necessary to assess whether spatial autocorrelation exists in the residuals.

mlr.output <- as.data.frame(condo.mlr1$residuals)

Converting to Spatial Data

I converted the condo_resale.res.sf dataset (which includes the residuals) into a spatial object using the as_Spatial() function.

condo_resale.res.sf <- cbind(condo_resale.sf, 
                        condo.mlr1$residuals) %>%
rename(`MLR_RES` = `condo.mlr1.residuals`)
condo_resale.sp <- as_Spatial(condo_resale.res.sf)
condo_resale.sp
class       : SpatialPointsDataFrame 
features    : 1436 
extent      : 14940.85, 43352.45, 24765.67, 48382.81  (xmin, xmax, ymin, ymax)
crs         : +proj=tmerc +lat_0=1.36666666666667 +lon_0=103.833333333333 +k=1 +x_0=28001.642 +y_0=38744.572 +ellps=WGS84 +towgs84=0,0,0,0,0,0,0 +units=m +no_defs 
variables   : 23
names       : POSTCODE, SELLING_PRICE, AREA_SQM, AGE,    PROX_CBD, PROX_CHILDCARE, PROX_ELDERLYCARE, PROX_URA_GROWTH_AREA, PROX_HAWKER_MARKET, PROX_KINDERGARTEN,    PROX_MRT,   PROX_PARK, PROX_PRIMARY_SCH, PROX_TOP_PRIMARY_SCH, PROX_SHOPPING_MALL, ... 
min values  :    18965,        540000,       34,   0, 0.386916393,    0.004927023,      0.054508623,          0.214539508,        0.051817113,       0.004927023, 0.052779424, 0.029064164,      0.077106132,          0.077106132,                  0, ... 
max values  :   828833,       1.8e+07,      619,  37, 19.18042832,     3.46572633,      3.949157205,           9.15540001,        5.374348075,       2.229045366,  3.48037319,  2.16104919,      3.928989144,          6.748192062,        3.477433767, ...

Visualizing Residuals on a Map

To investigate the spatial distribution of residuals, I plotted them on a map using tmap in view mode.

tmap_mode("view")
tmap mode set to interactive viewing
tm_shape(mpsz_svy21)+
  tmap_options(check.and.fix = TRUE) +
  tm_polygons(alpha = 0.4) +
tm_shape(condo_resale.res.sf) +  
  tm_dots(col = "MLR_RES",
          alpha = 0.6,
          style="quantile") +
  tm_view(set.zoom.limits = c(11,14))
Warning: The shape mpsz_svy21 is invalid (after reprojection). See
sf::st_is_valid
Variable(s) "MLR_RES" contains positive and negative values, so midpoint is set to 0. Set midpoint = NA to show the full spectrum of the color palette.
tmap_mode("plot")
tmap mode set to plotting

Constructing Neighbors List

I created a neighbors list for the condo resale points within a 1500-meter distance, which defines the spatial relationships between points.

nb <- dnearneigh(coordinates(condo_resale.sp), 0, 1500, longlat = FALSE)
Warning in dnearneigh(coordinates(condo_resale.sp), 0, 1500, longlat = FALSE):
neighbour object has 10 sub-graphs
summary(nb)
Neighbour list object:
Number of regions: 1436 
Number of nonzero links: 66266 
Percentage nonzero weights: 3.213526 
Average number of links: 46.14624 
10 disjoint connected subgraphs
Link number distribution:

  1   3   5   7   9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24 
  3   3   9   4   3  15  10  19  17  45  19   5  14  29  19   6  35  45  18  47 
 25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44 
 16  43  22  26  21  11   9  23  22  13  16  25  21  37  16  18   8  21   4  12 
 45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  60  61  62  63  64 
  8  36  18  14  14  43  11  12   8  13  12  13   4   5   6  12  11  20  29  33 
 65  66  67  68  69  70  71  72  73  74  75  76  77  78  79  80  81  82  83  84 
 15  20  10  14  15  15  11  16  12  10   8  19  12  14   9   8   4  13  11   6 
 85  86  87  88  89  90  91  92  93  94  95  96  97  98  99 100 101 102 103 104 
  4   9   4   4   4   6   2  16   9   4   5   9   3   9   4   2   1   2   1   1 
105 106 107 108 109 110 112 116 125 
  1   5   9   2   1   3   1   1   1 
3 least connected regions:
193 194 277 with 1 link
1 most connected region:
285 with 125 links

Calculating Spatial Weights

Next, I calculated spatial weights based on the neighbor list using the nb2listw() function. These weights are necessary for Moran’s I test.

nb_lw <- nb2listw(nb, style = 'W')
summary(nb_lw)
Characteristics of weights list object:
Neighbour list object:
Number of regions: 1436 
Number of nonzero links: 66266 
Percentage nonzero weights: 3.213526 
Average number of links: 46.14624 
10 disjoint connected subgraphs
Link number distribution:

  1   3   5   7   9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24 
  3   3   9   4   3  15  10  19  17  45  19   5  14  29  19   6  35  45  18  47 
 25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44 
 16  43  22  26  21  11   9  23  22  13  16  25  21  37  16  18   8  21   4  12 
 45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  60  61  62  63  64 
  8  36  18  14  14  43  11  12   8  13  12  13   4   5   6  12  11  20  29  33 
 65  66  67  68  69  70  71  72  73  74  75  76  77  78  79  80  81  82  83  84 
 15  20  10  14  15  15  11  16  12  10   8  19  12  14   9   8   4  13  11   6 
 85  86  87  88  89  90  91  92  93  94  95  96  97  98  99 100 101 102 103 104 
  4   9   4   4   4   6   2  16   9   4   5   9   3   9   4   2   1   2   1   1 
105 106 107 108 109 110 112 116 125 
  1   5   9   2   1   3   1   1   1 
3 least connected regions:
193 194 277 with 1 link
1 most connected region:
285 with 125 links

Weights style: W 
Weights constants summary:
     n      nn   S0       S1       S2
W 1436 2062096 1436 94.81916 5798.341

Testing for Spatial Autocorrelation

Finally, I applied Moran’s I test to check for spatial autocorrelation in the residuals. Significant spatial autocorrelation would indicate that spatial patterns exist in the model’s residuals, potentially suggesting that spatial dependencies were not fully accounted for in the model.

lm.morantest(condo.mlr1, nb_lw)

    Global Moran I for regression residuals

data:  
model: lm(formula = SELLING_PRICE ~ AREA_SQM + AGE + PROX_CBD +
PROX_CHILDCARE + PROX_ELDERLYCARE + PROX_URA_GROWTH_AREA + PROX_MRT +
PROX_PARK + PROX_PRIMARY_SCH + PROX_SHOPPING_MALL + PROX_BUS_STOP +
NO_Of_UNITS + FAMILY_FRIENDLY + FREEHOLD, data = condo_resale.sf)
weights: nb_lw

Moran I statistic standard deviate = 24.366, p-value < 2.2e-16
alternative hypothesis: greater
sample estimates:
Observed Moran I      Expectation         Variance 
    1.438876e-01    -5.487594e-03     3.758259e-05